Соната за Носорог и Теле в ла минор

[0]

Мислех първоначално да озаглавя темата Концерт за Носорог и оркестър в ре мажор, но поради акустиката на форума се отказах

[Rhino]

Петрифайд Ла Ремикс:

http://www.vbox7.com/play:4d0e89ab

[0]

Сервитьорът от нашия разказ в повечето случаи е младеж, от близките до курортите градчета или села, току що навършил 18 г., приключил учебната година със среден успех “добър”. Общият доход на родителите му не надхвърля 1000 лв. месечно. Той мечтае да има достатъчно джобни, за да заведе гаджето си в нощен клуб, да пуши боро, да си купи от по-новите нокии с повече място за емпетройки и с вграден фотоапарат. Да има поне един чифт маркови маратонки и да спечели парички за нова видеокарта на персоналния си компютър, за да си качи новата версия на любимата игра.

Изискването да е пълнолетен, за да го вземат на работа, често се нарушава, въпреки глобите. Из капанчетата по морето е пълно с дечковци, които са само на процент, не носят униформа, за да може в случай на внезапна проверка да седнат бързо на някоя маса и да се правят на клиент или бързичко да избягат в мазето, което работодателят им е приспособил за временна спалня от изтърбушен матрак, хвърлен в мръсотията на пода.

Цялата статия в блога на Ив. Бакалов: http://e-vestnik.bg/6157

[0]

Берлускони обяви и двата мотива на съпругата си за безпочвени. Но интервюто на Ноеми Летиция за "Република" май говори точно обратното.

В него красавицата казва, че Берлускони й обещал кариера като депутат в италианския парламент.

"Татенцето Силвио ще ме уреди", казва блондинката и уточнява, че не иска да опитва късмета си в предстоящите местни избори в Италия, а в тези за долната камара на италианския парламент.

В интервюто Ноеми отрича слуховете, появили се тези дни в италиански медии, че тя е незаконна дъщеря на Берлускони. Красавицата обаче казва, че премиерът "се държал с нея като със своя собствена дъщеря".

"Той винаги е мил с мен. Веднъж ми подари диамантче, друг път малко колие". За рождения й ден пък Берлускони й подарил златно колие и обеци с диаманти, разказва момичето.

"Обожавам го. Той ми се обажда, когато има свободно време и аз му отивам на гости в Милано или в Рим. Там слушам как ми разказва най-различни истории. Той точно това иска от мен. После пеем заедно", разказва Ноеми пред "Република".

Момичето признава, че Берлускони се показвал пред нея и като добър разказвач на мръсни вицове.

Когато съпругата на Берлускони поиска развод заради гостуването на премиера на партито на Ноеми Летиция, Берлускони открито попита какво лошо е направил. Съпругата му му отвърна задочно, чрез изказване пред медиите, че той дори не уважавал тържествата на собствените си деца.

[Emma]

...

[Emma]

...

[0]

[Emma]

...

[0]

Благодаря ти за мнението. Много съдържателно и напълно издържано. Сте си помисля дали можеш да пишеш в блога ми.

Уважаема, Вие и блог ли си направихте?

[Emma]

...

[0]

Смешна дърта лапландска плюшена Маймунка

Погал!

[Rhino]

Къде се загуби Плюшката?!

[0]

The Dutch Paedophile Emancipation Movement
Dr. Frits Bernard
From Paidika: The Journal of Paedophilia, volume 1 number 2 (Autumn 1987), p. 35-45. Copyright © 1987, Frits Bernard. Reprinted by special permission of Frits Bernard and Paidika.

Paidika editor's note:
Dr. Frits Bernard is a Clinical Psychologist, and was the founder of the International Enclave Movement. He is on the Board of Directors of the Association for the Advancement of Social Scientific Sex Research, Dьsseldorf, and the Association for Human Sexuality, Berlin, and a member of the German Society for Sex Research, Frankfort, and the Association for Sexology, Utrecht. He has published numerous articles on paedophilia, a scholarly work on the subject which has appeared in three languages, and two novels. This article is copyrighted by Dr. Frits Bernard, 1987.

Early History
When one describes the history of paedophile emancipation, one must draw on memory, certainly as far as the initial phase is concerned. For today's generation it is barely possible to imagine the circumstances under which paedophiles lived in the years before 1955. They were isolated from one another, and the notion of 'coming out' was not even being talked about. The laws were strictly enforced, and in the Netherlands article 248bis of the Penal Code, enacted in 1911 and abolished in 1971, which discriminated in favor of heterophiles, was still applicable.1 Homosexual contacts and relationships between adults and individuals under the age of 21 were punishable, while the heterosexual age of consent was 16. Paedophilia was not yet an issue, and the term 'sexual minority' was not yet being used. There was very little literature on the subject, except for psychiatric papers dominated by an analysis of the pathological aspects of paedophilia.

The Beginning
In 1940 I communicated by telephone with Jhr. Mr. J.A. Schorer, who at the time was the chairman of the Wetenschappelijk Humanitaire Comitй in the Netherlands. Through him I came into contact with Dr. Benno Premsela, who was one of the first sexologists in the Netherlands. These were the first concrete steps I took concerning the paedophile issue. However, the German invasion and the dissolution of the Comitй prevented any further contacts until the next decade.

Human beings have the tendency not to make judgements based on facts, especially in sexual matters, but rather on simplified abstractions of reality. New facts, including scientific research, are generally not accepted or respected. This had long been the case with homosexuality. Misguided notions thrived, and there was active resistance to any revision of opinion. The question which occupied me was how to combat this attitude and bring paedophilia into the forum of discussion, and thus better the lot of those with paedophile feelings. I concluded that the giving of information and advice had to take precedence, but scholarly and scientific studies had to be initiated and a group of active people who would devote themselves to the integration of child sexuality and paedophilia into society would have to be organized. Up to this point in time, nothing of this kind had existed. It was a totally new idea.


If one sees paedophilia as the loving of children, also in the erotic sense, and this can mean girls and/or boys, then it is clear that paedophilia does not fall under the category of homosexuality. In the meantime my attempts to form the 'Enclave Kring' were taking shape. The name Enclave was chosen because this reflected the fact that paedophiles live in isolation, in a kind of enclave. The start was difficult and by no means a bed of roses.

Although, from the very beginning, Enclave was meant for heterophile as well as homophile paedophiles, the group developed more in the homophile direction. Why is not clear. There did evolve, remarkably enough in Spain, the Lolita Club, a small club in which a number of heterosexual paedophiles had united. The members corresponded anonymously with each other and exchanged non-pornographic photographs through the mail. This organization dissolved without a trace. Nothing more was heard about the founder, a businessman from Barcelona. What exactly happened will most likely never come to light.

The first foundations of the 'Enclave Kring', which developed slowly into the International Enclave Movement, were laid at Mispelstraat 3, The Hague. It was there that the first meetings and discussions took place, albeit on a small scale. The first circulars were drafted and distributed. In 1960 Enclave moved to Rotterdam.

People from various countries joined; Enclave was in touch with a number of institutions and organizations. From the many letters which were received, the great psychological distress paedophiles everywhere were experiencing was revealed. Correspondence was conducted in no less than six languages. And yet Enclave remained, in part, an underground movement. The time for a real 'coming out' was years away.

The objectives of the International Enclave Movement were (among others) to break down prejudice about the issues of erotic contacts and relationships between minors and adults, and to provide information and advice as well as to initiate a direct assistance program. It goes without saying that efforts were made toward a revision of the penal code.

The background philosophy of the international Enclave Movement was to attempt to develop new moral views concerning paedophilia based upon scientific investigation of facts rather than upon traditional moral judgements which find paedophilia unacceptable. To answer the question of whether the movement for the emancipation of paedophiles is justified and whether those with paedophile feelings should assert their rights, we must investigate what children think of paedophile contacts and what the psychological consequences of consensual paedophile contacts are for the children who are involved in them. Here we must rely on the results attained by the most objective scholarly/ scientific research. Research done in the early 1970s confirmed that consensual sexual contact between children and adults is not per se negative, and in some cases can have a positive effect on the child.5 The aspirations of Enclave were therefore justifiable.

Ultimately the whole paedophile problem is a political problem. I have often argued that facts are the basis for constructive discussion in politics. In a discussion about paedophilia it is essential to lay the facts on the table before any discussion leading to a resolution can begin. It is only then that a debate about, for example, the lowering of the age of consent can bear fruit. Without a doubt, emotions will continue to play a role and on the whole can fulfill a positive role at that by revealing where the spheres of intolerance are. When those with paedophile feelings become angry, this can be taken as a signal and can show up the injustice of their situation. We should take these emotions very seriously and not reproach them. But listening to others will always be a difficult business.

It was also in 1960 that the three-part series "Ephebophilie en Weterischap" appeared in Vriendschap. This series presented a closer investigation of the concepts of paedophilia and ephebophilia. In this article I proposed that paedophiles are primarily interested in the child who has not yet reached puberty and ephebophiles are principally interested in children during the age of puberty and after. The boundary between the two is not rigid as the one phenomenon flows into the other, but it is nevertheless important to keep them distinct. Authors such as Benedict Friedlдnder and John Henry Mackay put the accent on ephebophilia and not on paedophilia in its full sense of love for children. Inaccuracy in the descriptions of the two has led to much confusion and misunderstanding, before and now.

Here is one excerpt from a letter written in 1965:

The changeover of the COC's Vriendschap to Dialoog (apparently due to the changing situation in the Netherlands) is for me personally a great disappointment. Most of all I miss your literary survey which was of great interest to me. And I feel intuitively that in Dialoog (and perhaps in De Schakel as well) that the phenomenon of paedophilia, due to public opinion, has been pushed into the background as much as possible, as if they wish to distance themselves from the issue. It is because of this trend that I have now subscribed to Der Weg and Der Kreis as well as Amigo from Scandinavia in order to keep up with current events. I would therefore be grateful to hear whether the paedophile magazine that Enclave intends to release on an international basis indeed will come out. Or, is there another way to get a list of new literature? I would be very disappointed to miss any paedophile publications.



As early as the first half of 1972 there appeared Sex met Kinderen (Sex with Children), published by the NVSH. This book signalled the beginning of a new development.

Paedophile workgroups arose in a number of cities. They took care of paedophiles in distress, as well as organized all kinds of activities: open forums, readings, etc. Information was made available to those outside the paedophile community, such as schools, the police and the press. This helped pave the way for a more open attitude about sexuality and paedophilia.

The book Sex met Kinderen had an effect throughout Europe and abroad. The historian Dr. E. Born underlines the effect of the book in the Netherlands in the foreword of his brochure Paedophile Integration after 1959:

The Dutch paedophiles feel as though they have survived a long siege. Some have ventured out, but most continue to exist in hiding and must endure the consequent hardships. Even today we can gauge the courage that must have been necessary to speak of paedophilia in the sixties, not to mention the courage needed less than ten years ago to oppose a murderous taboo, to stress the urgent need for assistance and understanding, and for an intelligent unprejudiced approach to the phenomenon of paedophilia. The integration of the paedophile into society started for the first time only last year. Attempts to do this can be dated back to the beginning of the sixties.15

The national paedophile workgroups attained official status in the form of the Hoofdbestuurscommissie Pedofilie, NVSH, on January 20, 1973. New local paedophile workgroups still continue to come into being.

In an information brochure from 1973 the goal of the workgroups was presented as follows:

The primary goal of the national and local workgroups is to provide the chance for paedophiles to meet each other and thereby help them to emerge from isolation. This opportunity in itself is a liberating experience.

Expert assistance for paedophiles who are in distress is being organized, and furthermore efforts are being made to relieve the plight of this oppressed group. The workgroups facilitate regular contact between paedophiles and non-paedophiles within as well as outside the workgroups. This is possible since non-paedophiles joined the workgroups as well as the administrative bodies of these workgroups. The NVSH board, active members of NVSH, form part of the national workgroup.

Still active is "Stichting Martijn" (Amsterdam). They produce a high quality monthly magazine, O.K.: Info-magazine over Ouderen-Kinderen-relaties. It prints the latest news as well as background information and is illustrated with photos and sketches.

[0]

The Future
Looking back on the 1970s, we can see that they were years of initiative, emancipation, research, and above all optimism. The 1980s have proved otherwise. After 1982-1983 the deterioration has been rapid. In Holland resistance was mounted against the dearly won sexual freedoms, and foreign powers have tried more and more to influence Dutch moral attitudes.

The NVSH membership dropped drastically to under ten thousand in the 1980s, and it consequently faced a financial crisis.25 The recovery has been slow.

Paedophile organizations in foreign countries have had great problems: the Swiss and French-speaking Belgian groups were destroyed by police action, and many people were arrested. Everywhere there has been an hysteria over paedophilia and child sexuality, often degenerating into witch-hunts. The media deal with the phenomenon with complete lack of understanding. Phenomenologically distinct categories are mixed together: paedophilia and ephebophilia are not distinguished, and both are equated with child-abuse.

Reaction against progress might be expected; improvement is never steady. Religious fundamentalism and its judgmental morality is now again gaining ground. After this negative period, probably a more positive one will follow; how long that will last nobody can say.

The Dutch organizations stand in the breach. They are again needed now more than ever. Herman de Coninck came to the conclusion in an article he wrote in Humo (1994) that paedophiles had by then almost achieved their aims.

An article by Rineke van Daalen and Bram van Stolk appeared in the special issue of De Psycholoog (official monthly organ of the Netherlands Psychological Association) of July/August 1993 entitled "Psychological Help With Problems Involving Homosexuality, Paedophilia and Sexual Abuse: The pressure of the social debate", from which the following conclusions can be cited:

Social acceptance of paedophiles and paedophilia as a final victory of the sexual revolution has not happened. The period in which it was discussed in society was really rather short--in the Monthly Journal of Mental Health from 1973 to 1978. Under pressure from increasing concerns about abuse and violence, the tide turned in society against the paedophiles, resulting in important changes in ideas in the areas of social assistance and punishment. In the 1980s it again became acceptable to treat paedophiles as sick people and perpetrators of criminal offences.

It is very tempting, from our present-day perspective, to attribute the failure of paedophile emancipation to power imbalance between paedophiles and children. But if we think back to the early 1970s, this development could never have been predicted. Consisting the gist of the discussions at that time, the chances of significant improvement in the position of paedophiles in society did not seem too bad.

Evaluation and Conclusions
Paedophile emancipation in The Netherlands began about 30 years ago. An historical analysis reveals how this process has taken place up to the present time:

a) Before about 1955 there were absolutely no developments in paedophile emancipation. Paedophiles lived in isolation. There was only a single, one-sided, and above all dubious psychiatric approach.

b) Between about 1955 and 1965 Enclave began to challenge this view. Paedophiles came into contact with one another. Aid for paedophiles was started. A new vision of the phenomenon developed. Scientific research was set on the agenda. The COC played an important part in all of this through its monthly publication Vriendschap.

c) The years between 1965 and 1970 were a period of consolidation. The COC rejected paedophilia; its new magazine Dialoog was not sympathetic.

d) The decade of the seventies saw a number of Enclave initiatives put into action. Within the NVSH the national paedophile workgroup was formed. The book Sex met kinderen appeared in 1972. Scientific research was carried out. Once again paedophiles came together, but this time under the aegis of a non-paedophile organization. There were congresses in Breda between 1973 and 1975, the first "coming out". The workgroup took on its own identity. There was an important symposium in Amsterdam in 1977. The workgroup appeared more and more often in newspapers, on radio and television. At the end of the seventies there was a shift of emphasis: now, within the work group, the child was perceived as the most important element and emancipation of children the group's most important goal.

e) During the 1980s emancipation suffered reversals. People started to question whether the vision of sexual emancipation was correct.

According to C. Straver, the process of emancipation has three phases which, in my opinion, are roughly applicable to paedophilia. They are:

1.) An advance guard of the elite comes cautiously out in order to plead the interests of the group with the dominant forces of government and society with their prevailing opinions, appealing to and confident in their sense of justice and rejection of prejudice.

2.) Through mutual association the group forms its own identity and works toward an increase of self-awareness. The accent is upon self-knowledge, but there are a few outward initiatives.

3.) The group comes out, forges a strategy to have its wishes granted, confronts the dominant elements of society with its stands and the justice of its demands by means of education and provocative actions. The accent is on outward activities directed toward integration into society, being considered equal. Helping and caring for one another assume second place.27

Through my psychotherapeutic practice, as advisor in forensic cases, through Enclave, COC and NVSH, and by means of personal contact, I have met more than a thousand people with paedophile feelings during the course of the years. The number of children I met who had contacts with adults was over three thousand. When I review in my mind all these cases, I can only come to the following conclusions:

People with paedophile feelings are just like other people; the variability in paedophiles is probably as great as that in the general population. A child who is interested in sexual contacts with adults is as normal as the child who is not interested in such contacts.

Paedophilia is, first and foremost, not a problem for the paedophile; it is apparently also not a problem for the child. Paedophilia is primarily a problem for the non-paedophile, for society.

Our attitude towards paedophilia can very well be the touchstone for the way we can and dare feel about sexuality in general and that of children in particular.

Heterosexuality, homosexuality, bisexuality and paedophilia should be considered equally valuable forms of human behavior.

Paedophiles can enrich society by bringing into it new perspectives.

[Rhino]

Paedophiles can enrich society by bringing into it new perspectives.

Що пък не. Тук повечето сме некрофили.